The framers of the Constitution ensured that the Indian republic would be based on direct elections with the adult franchise. Their membership of the Constituent Assembly, however, was a result of indirect elections with no adult franchise.

In 1946 the Cabinet Mission Plan (‘Plan’) formally set up the Assembly and put down some guidelines and rules on its functioning and composition. It preferred adult franchise to elect Assembly members. However, this would delay setting up the Assembly - something that the Plan, due to the complexity and uncertainty of the prevailing political ambience, wanted to avoid.

The Plan decided that the next best, and the pragmatic, solution would be to take advantage of the recently elected 1946 Provincial Legislative Assemblies. 26 million people voted in these elections on a limited franchise.

These Provincial Legislative Assemblies, through a single transferable vote, elected 229 members from 12 Indian Provinces to the Constituent Assembly. In addition to this, the Plan set up a Negotiation Committee to involve the Princely States in the constitution-making process – 70 representatives of the Princely States came onboard.

The Plan distributed the provincial allotment of seats between the main communities (General, Muslim and Sikh). In order to protect the interests of smaller minorities, an Advisory Committee on the rights of citizens, minorities and tribal and excluded areas was set up.

So, does the indirect election of Assembly members diminish the representative credentials of the Assembly? It is important to note that there was no principled stand against direct elections and adult franchise either from the Plan or Indian political leaders –  these modes of elections were the preferred option, but not viable at the time. Nonetheless, some effort was made to ensure representation – at least with respect to the religious communities – in the provincial distribution of seats.

Another way to evaluate the representative credentials of the Assembly is to look at the composition of the Assembly itself. While the Plan set out the broad contours of the distribution of seats, India political parties could give out tickets to individuals of their choice within the Plan's boundaries. Were these choices informed by a need to ensure representation of different communities? We can get a sense of this by looking at the composition of the Assembly, which we will do in the next post in this series.

Next: #3: What did the Constituent Assembly think of its representative credentials?

Previous: #1: Was the Constituent Assembly indigenous?