Constituent Assembly Members

T.T Krishnamachari

1899 - 1974

Key Information






Mother Tongue:


Committee Memberships


Early Life:

Tiruvallur Thattai Krishnamachari was born on 26 November 1899 to a Madras High Court judge. He received his education from Madras University. In 1928, he set up TTK Company Ltd., an indenting agency. A few years later, he joined politics full-time and left the company’s affairs to his sons.

Role in India’s Independence Movement:

Krishnamachari became a member of the Madras Legislative Assembly in 1937 and of the Central Legislative Assembly in 1942.

Contribution to Constitution Making:

Krishnamachari was elected to the Constituent Assembly from Madras on a Congress Party ticket. As a member of the Drafting Committee, he dedicated 4014 hours in numerous assignments of the Committee. In the Assembly, he intervened on the issues of freedom of speech and emergency provisions, among others.

Later Contributions:

Krishnamachari was the Central Minister for Iron and Steel between 1955 and 1957. Later, he served briefly as the Finance Minister in 1956. During his tenure, he brought in key tax reforms; he introduced taxes on capital gains, wealth, estate and expenditure. Amidst the Mundhra corruption scandal, he resigned in 1958. But in 1963, he was recalled to Nehru’s cabinet and served as the Finance Minister for two years.

He played a crucial role in the setting up of financial organizations including Industrial Development Bank of India and Unit Trust of India.

He passed away on 7 March 1974 leaving behind three sons.

Key Writings:

In 1954, Krishnamachari authored his memoir ‘Parliamentary Life during 1929-54‘, as a part of the Silver Jubilee Commemoration Volume published by Lok Sabha Secretariat.

Key Speeches
  1. Krishnamachari wanted to include ‘contempt of court’ as a restriction to freedom of speech and expression.
  2. He argued against inclusion of Devadasi in Article 23. Instead he insisted that the social practices must be tackled through legislative reforms and public mobilization.
  3. Responding to criticism on emergency provisions, he pointed out that these provisions are crucial in protecting the constitution against future misuse of power.