343852

The other point in Mr. Naziruddin Ahmad’s amendment is that the language used in the Government of India Act, Item 11, is more appropriate. The difference between that language and the one which has been used in this item is that instead of saying “financed wholly or in part by the Federation” you will have the words “controlled or financed by the Federation”. So far as the latter part is concerned, it is practically the same as Mr. Santhanam’s amendment. The use of the words “controlled or” would bring into the purview of this item institutions which may not be finance either wholly or in part by the Federation but which the Federation might seek merely to control. The whole idea behind Mr. Santhanam’s amendment is that the Federation should not legislate about any institutions of the kind which are not financed wholly or in part by the Federation. Therefore it seems to me that in order to sub serve the object of the amendment which has been accepted it is not possible for me to accept the language used in the Government of India Act.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *