354638

The clause in question is to this effect, that “the citizens, men and women equally, have an adequate means of livelihood.” I submit, Sir, that the words ‘men and women equally’ are unnecessary and redundant. Infact with the acceptance of this amendment, the clause would run thus: “that the citizens have the right to an adequate means of livelihood.” I submit, Sir, that the word ‘citizen’ has been defined in article 5, clause (a). That definition is in general terms and I presume includes the feminine. The masculine, as it is well known, embraces the feminine. In the circumstances, as we have defined,…………….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *