Sir, I am opposed to the statutory obligation on the part of the president to consult the Rajpramukh. I know in practice the president will always consult the Rajpramukh but if there is any statutory obligation it means that the sphere of the sphere of action of the proposition that advise tendered by the Rajpramukh therefore sir, I am in favour of the proposition that the authority of the president in this sphere should be unrestricted and unhampered sir there is another reason why I am against the Rajpramukh I want that all powers as for as possible, should be vested in the hands of the president, which means in the hands of the government of India, being fundamentally opposed to federalism and provincial autonomy and being an advocate of a unitary state, I feel that powers should be vested autonomy and being an advocate of a unitary state I feel that powers should be vested, as far as this topic is concerned, in the hands of the president and the president alone.
