Prior to the ides of August 1947 the sovereign power in India or the sovereignity by which our beloved Mother noble, innocent, humble and gentle and majestic, was well sapped by Hanoverian dynasty, which established Empire in India,by conniving at our Hindus, dismantled my malicious motive. I.e., King of England after conquest and being in possession of the Empire thenceforward, was called after the Emperor of India. Now by 15th of August 1947 after the transference of the reins of the Government to the responsible Indian Hands, the term “Empire” with the title “Emperor” has ceased to exist: while the effigy of King George VI of England is in currency. Not only that, one peculiar feature is that the Governor-General is in vogue but new elements, by names Premier and Parliament have o emerged. In British India the sovereign power was vested in the hands of the King of England and represented through the designation Governor-General-in Council, [unclear]under whom several Governors over Provinces are in existence. When the transformancetion of th[unclear]e power has taken place, like a nightmare on the midnight of August 15th of 1947, why should be, and with what object should is the designation Governor-General, though constitutional, should be allowed.xxxxxxxxxx to move on the lips of the public despite of the so-called attainment of Independence to India under the term “Dominion Status.” Very strange and mysterious. Is the power completely based in the hands of the public? Or is i t placed, in the hands completely of the Premier, or the Governor-General, or[unclear] Parliament? Or is it placed still, in the hands of the King of England? In whose hands it is vested? Whose decision in matters of passing laws, or framing Acts, or Constitution, is final? Whose seall is to be affixed to it? Is it the seal of the Governor-General that shall have to be made responsible for the pros and cons of the Acts, or Acts of that of the Premier, or that of the Parliament, who represent at present Congress, out of whose toils and labours, this infinitismally small independence, under Dominion Status is obtained, or achieved, is the problem to be mooted? Hitherto, if any Act was made of if any act xxwas/performed, the seal or the fassimile of the King of England in some respect or other as an[unclear] authenticity to that effect, xx was affixed. But now, in Indian India, i.e., in the Dominion of India whose fassimile has to be affixed [unclear]as final and authentic representing thes sovereign power of the land.
