Instrument of accession and succession to the throne in pursuance of Hnindu royal lineage ought to have been framed affixing seal to it, without which nothing can be made valid. Paraxodidal as it is, how the present Government giving consent to monarchy without sovereignity, indirectly on one hand, and on the other declaring that India wants republic etc, which may be said as devices or excegencies of the day. How can the passing of Zamindari bill or any ohther bill that may be given legal effect. amidst dynamic constitutional and transitoanal period, in lieu lieu of sovereignity not fixed, or ascertained so far by simple acceptance by simple acceptance of the Governor-General, constitutionally shaped after 15th August, 1947 and in !existence prior to that date? The moment the British or the foreign rulers have been said to have lost their Indian Empire, the very moment it is presumed that the Governor-General and acts thereon, have become in toto null and void and cannot be treated as, either representing from that date King of England, or acting as King of India, under the designation Emperor of Dominion of India. So, the procedure adopted by the Government regarding the stablisation of the so-called sovereignity or fixing up Constitution, and thereby giving a legal tender to certain conspicuous acts and currency may be said to be, erroneous and deviating from the path of righteousness. This is not administering local bodies, or is it the process of administering provinces. It is the process of holding complete and full responsibility on behalf of the nation, and administering the country in full vigour, with foresight, broad outlook and nobility.
